Note that I have no clue where the GERMANIUM above come from!!??
3) The execution of “REST_ViewG4Event” yields the following warning/error messages:
Error in <TBufferFile::ReadClassBuffer>: Could not find the StreamerInfo for version 2 of the class TRestBrowser, object skipped at offset 65
Error in <TBufferFile::CheckByteCount>: object of class TRestBrowser read too few bytes: 2 instead of 1335
-- Warning : -- W : The metadata version found on input file is lower than 2.2.1!
-- Warning : -- W : metadata from input file will not be read
Concerning my THREE errors reproted above: I get them also w/ v2.2.9_dev.
Concerning your previous ticket: I had seen it… But my attention was caught by the first line :
System : MacOs
=> Which I immediately connected w/ my bad past experience w/ ROOT on Mac: I have NOT been able to install a decent ROOT under the latest OS, viz. Mojave.
What fixes errors (1) and (2) is setting REST_VERBOSITY back to = normal!
=> Extreme debugging has weird side effects!..
This is what I am going to work on next. What I have in mind is to implement the the 4-vectors of the 3 particles of the µp → µp event, which I have generated w/ a Si-based trigger from elsewhere. This, in a new generator type.
But then, I miss the hydrogen, since I am allowed to have a single sensitive volume at a time. Right?
Then I agree, it’s something I may consider, in parallel. But to be useful I would need to have the FOUR Si’s of the telescope, so as to be able to trigger on the scattering angle.
And btw, I simplified my geometry (simplified for the purpose of this simple exercise I have reported on so far): I have in fact a TPC volume (between electrodes), w/ several daughter volumes inside, describing so many additional devices.
While I want instead to have only hydrogen as sensitive medium. The right way to go then is to create yet another daughter volume, which would be the sensitive one, and which I derive via the subtraction procedure that you, yourself, have implemented for the Cu vessel of PANDAX. Right?
I was thinking in case you launch the muon just behind silicon 1, then you put your sensitive volume on the silicon 4. Then, you are selecting tracks that necessarily went through 4 silicon detectors and the hydrogen target.
The subtraction method is very important when we use <generator type="volume" ...>.
Not sure about the right way to go, I guess it needs to be tested. In any case, I agree, you must simplify your geometry to the maximum. 1-single hydrogen volume would be enough at the beginning. Then, once you get some results, if you wish, you may increase geometry complexity, and try to see if there is any effect by introducing detail elements.